Comments on: Secret Communion Goes Ahead http://www.peter-ould.net/2007/11/29/secret-communion-goes-ahead?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=secret-communion-goes-ahead Peter Ould Online Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:47:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Peter Ould http://www.peter-ould.net/2007/11/29/secret-communion-goes-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-73947 Peter Ould Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:50:39 +0000 http://www.peter-ould.net/2007/11/29/secret-communion-goes-ahead/#comment-73947 Morning Harold, I believe the problem was with the fact that a Communion service in a Church of England building is de facto a public service and should be advertised as such. Throw in the whole issue around same-sex behaviour and the whole story is a potent mix of non-canonical services and the ABoC being seen to favour one particular group. Morning Harold,

I believe the problem was with the fact that a Communion service in a Church of England building is de facto a public service and should be advertised as such. Throw in the whole issue around same-sex behaviour and the whole story is a potent mix of non-canonical services and the ABoC being seen to favour one particular group.

]]> By: Harold J. Wilson http://www.peter-ould.net/2007/11/29/secret-communion-goes-ahead/comment-page-1#comment-73946 Harold J. Wilson Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:46:24 +0000 http://www.peter-ould.net/2007/11/29/secret-communion-goes-ahead/#comment-73946 Hello, I fail to understand why there is any objection to a communion celebration for a particular group of people, as, e.g. a wedding party, a family, a sickbed, or a society. Does the press or other opposing advocacy groups have to be notified and invited to all such? Talk about whining. Thank God for an archbishop who does actually listen. It seems to me that there is a considerable difference between the attitude of the group you have described and the website of, e.g. the gay fair in SF you posted a few days ago which is flagrantly erotic and exhibitionistic. Any stick will do to beat a dog? Hello, I fail to understand why there is any objection to a communion celebration for a particular group of people, as, e.g. a wedding party, a family, a sickbed, or a society. Does the press or other opposing advocacy groups have to be notified and invited to all such? Talk about whining. Thank God for an archbishop who does actually listen. It seems to me that there is a considerable difference between the attitude of the group you have described and the website of, e.g. the gay fair in SF you posted a few days ago which is flagrantly erotic and exhibitionistic. Any stick will do to beat a dog?

]]>