Tag: Bulls

The Wilkinson B&B Appeal

The full text of the appeal is available online. There are some interesting subtleties in the Justices’ ruling which are worth pointing out. Firstly, on whether Preddy vs Bull (the Cornish B&B case) was direct discrimination or not. 21. I

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Waiting for the Real Test Case

Some brief thoughts on the B&B issue (copied and adapted from a comment I made earlier this morning). In both cases so far (Bulls and Wilkinsons) one of the key criticisms made by the justices were the inconsistency of the

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Bull vs Hall and Preddy – The Appeal

The appeal in this case is out. The Bulls (quite rightly) lost when the court ruled very clearly that since Hall and Preddy were in a Civil Partnership, to not treat them the same way as a married couple was

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Graeme Archer on the B&B Ruling

As always, Graeme is challenging and insightful. The B&B case. So we have now proven that a quango can criminalise bed and breakfast owners who don’t want gay people to stay in their property (please, no quibbling about the exact

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Top