You might have noticed, if you read Anglican Mainstream, that Lisa has posted two responses to my critique of her piece a few days ago. I am of course disappointed that she couldn’t engage in open discussion on the comment …

More on Anglican Mainstream’s Sexual Exclusivity Post Read more »

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Given all the fuss today about “The Wave” (which appears to me to be a bunch of people dressed in blue protesting about the fact that there has been no discernible change in the Earth’s temperature for almost 15 years), …

Climategate Read more »

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

I don’t think you could have missed the furore over the past few days since Anglican Mainstream published a critique of CMS’ involvement in Greenbelt. CMS’ response was short and succint, essentially implying that the nature of Greenbelt has changed …

Anglican Mainstream on Greenbelt Read more »

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Alan Jacobs has written a helpful critique of one of the points I made below. I have a number of qualms about the validity of Ould’s reading of the Councils’ “principle of diocesan integrity.” First of all, his reading would …

Clarifying the Nicene Point Read more »

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,