In case you missed it, a tremendous response from Fulcrum. No-one can argue that they’re soft on this issue. I’ve added emphasis to what I think is the crucial call to the Archbishop of Canterbury as to what has to …

Fulcrum on the Los Angeles Episcopacy Read more »

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Question. What has over 800 legs, 400 brains (some of them covered by the most impressive eyebrows), several purple shirts and yet still can’t come to an agreed mind on the introduction of women bishops. Answer (if you still hadn’t …

Live Blogging Synod Read more »

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The more observant of you today (30th January) will notice that the site has up a picture of Charles I and the collect for today. It reads: King of kings and Lord of lords, whose faithful servant Charles prayed for …

Why Charles and why a martyr? Read more »

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Surprisingly, there is a little gem in the current Times serialisation of Gene Robinson’s book, a nugget that all those on the conservative side need to grab hold of and understand: The worst part is that it’s reminiscent of the …

Something Sensible from Gene Robinson Read more »

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,