No #2 – Miranda Threlfall-Holmes

They keep on coming. After Simon Tillotson’s great explanation of his “No” vote, Miranda Threlfall-Holmes has responded to my request and has provided the following paragraph:

My vote certainly was not meant to be a vote against the uniqueness of Christ! I voted no to Paul Eddy’s motion because it seemed to me from the debate that as a Synod and as a Church we were in no doubt as to the uniqueness of Christ and about how to share that sensitively and appropriately in a variety of cultural contexts in the UK, and that therefore it was a waste of time and money commissioning a report on those things.

Once again, please comment below. I’ve invited Miranda to join in the thread if appropriate and I hope there’ll be the same kind of positive interaction with her as on Simon’s thread.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , ,