The Great Consummation – Genesis 6:1-4

When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the Lord said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. These were the mighty men who were of old, the men of renown.

NephilimThere are a number of opinions as to what is going on in this passage. The sons of God and the daughters of man could be one of the following.

  1. The “sons of God” are angels, fallen or otherwise. Although the Scriptures are full of examples of angels being described in this manner (Job 1:6, Ps 29:1) or taking on bodily form there is also Jesus’ teaching on marriage in heaven (or the lack of it). This interpretation is unlikely.
  2. The “sons of God” are men who have achieved high status, rulers or judges. Their wives are polygamous harems and this is the sinful behaviour.
  3. The “sons of God” are the descendants of Seth whilst the “daughters of man” are the descendants of Cain. As we saw before, Cain’s line ends in murder (again) but Seth’s line ends in redemption through Noah.

Whichever of these options it is, the interesting thing is that when the sons of God find the daughters of man attractive, this is the same root word as in Genesis 3 when the Fall occurs.

So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate.
Genesis 3:6

The key here is that the sexual union which is good in the Garden of Eden (“they knew no shame”) is now corrupted as part of the Fall. Whether it is a move to polygamy or simply compromising holiness, sex is seen to be a powerful driving force in the lives of humans, leading to outcomes that are less than perfect. God’s judgement on these unions is to limit the life of man.

It is unlikely that the Nephilim are the offspring of this union (a view favoured by those who take position (i) above). Rather they are simply genetically tall humans as mentioned in Numbers 13:33.

Posted in The Great Consummation
  • Broadwood

    An opaque passage, this one. Do you subscribe to the view that it was Moses who catalysed the process
    of writing down the Hebrew scriptures? If so, this account must have
    formed part of an earlier oral tradition.
    Most tribes have a name for themselves which roughly translates as ‘the people’ – the implication being that all others are NOT ‘the people’. Is this passage describing a dimly remembered similar situation where marrying-out of the ‘sons of God’ with ‘the others’ occurred, and led to trouble?

    • I think you’re right, that this is a “them and us” situation. I’m interested in how that links back into the previous genealogies and therefore into the way those genealogies place soteriological iconography at the forefront.

      • Broadwood

        Yes, I really enjoyed your gematria table for the patriarchs in the last post. Very interesting. I couldn’t get to your ‘sorrow’ link for Kenan though – Strong’s has it as ‘to nest or dwell’.

        Some understand the huge ages in this genealogy to refer to the family history between named individual descendent rather than individual lifespans – similar to the way later in Genesis the names of Jacob’s sons are used almost interchangeably to refer to the individual as well as the tribe that descended from them – a much more collectivist view.