More Arguments for Polygamy
While the Supreme Court and the rest of us are all focused on the human right of marriage equality, letâ€™s not forget that the fight doesnâ€™t end with same-sex marriage. We need to legalize polygamy, too. Legalized polygamy in the United States is the constitutional, feminist, and sex-positive choice.
…legalizing consensual adult polygamy wouldnâ€™t legalize rape or child abuse. In fact, it would make those crimes easier to combatâ€¦ Right now,allÂ polygamous families, including the healthy, responsible ones, are driven into hiding… In the resulting isolation, crime and abuse can flourish unimpeded.
If a woman wants to marry a man, thatâ€™s great. If she wants to marry another woman, thatâ€™s great tooâ€¦ And if she wants to marry a man with three other wives, thatâ€™sÂ her damn choice.
Though polygamists are a minorityâ€”a tiny minority, in factâ€”freedom has no value unless it extends to even the smallest and most marginalized groups among us.
Deep End’s response at Conservative Home is just so simple and obvious.
Keenan rather understates her case here. Though theÂ formalÂ practice of polygamy may be rare in the west (outside of certain minority cultures), informal polygamy is relatively common â€“ for instance, in the case of a man who maintains a long-term relationship with a partner other than his wife).Â Why should the â€˜other womanâ€™ in such a relationship be marginalised as a â€˜mistressâ€™ when she could enjoy equal rights within some form of modern marriage?
As for the interests of children, western societies already tolerate â€“ and, in many respects, encourage â€“ a variety of non-traditional family structures.
Admittedly, the recognition of polygamous marriage would raise a number of legal complications â€“ due to there being more than two people and more than one relationship involved. However, as weâ€™ve seen in this country, same sex marriage has also raised certain complications, which have been resolved in various ways (for instance, by having no legal concept of consummation).
Of course, if you were to ask those who support same sex marriage whether theyâ€™d also support polygamous marriage, then most of them would say no â€“ especially the politicians. But on what grounds would they justify their opposition? Certainly, as Jillian Keenan makes clear, theÂ socially liberalÂ case for legalising polygamy is pretty watertight. So what other grounds does that leave?
Well, one could always assert a traditional cultural norm â€“ but social liberals may want to think twice before pulling on that thread.
Come on then liberals – tell me why this argument is wrong.