Two thoughts from the Sermon on the Mount
First, Julie Rogers has been thinking about identity and sexuality.
Toward the end of my time speaking with Exodus, I started publicly saying I was â€œgayâ€. I didnâ€™t plan on using that label to describe my experience, but it came out because I was honestly sharing my heart, and honestly sharing about my experience involved saying I have aÂ really gayÂ orientation. It made sense to use the label most commonly used for ongoing, persistent same-sex attractions to describe my ongoing, persistent same-sex attractions: gay. I would discuss how I previously focused on my sexuality to the neglect of focusing on Christ in two ways: 1.) by finding my identity in my sexuality and re-imagining Scripture in a way that affirmed gay sexual expression, and 2.) by placing my hope in becoming heterosexual with the prosperity-Gospel-leaning â€œhealingâ€ message so I could one day live into the romance narrative that is less about Christ and more about the removal of uncomfortable tension here on earth. I shared about being a celibate gay Christian with an identity in Christ, whoâ€™s built upon the foundation of Christ, entirely rooted in the way of Christ, with my hope in the fullness of redemption that will culminate with Christâ€™s return.
I was surprised to find that, suddenly, I started getting push back from many Christians. Many have latched onto the â€œgayâ€ part when I use that adjective to describe my same-sex attractions,Â and theyâ€™ve been concerned that I (or others like me) am claiming a gay identity. Theyâ€™ve expressed concern that Iâ€™m â€œdefining myself by my sinâ€. I always listen closely when people approach me about it because the thing that defines us (the foundation upon which we build our sense of self) is going to be the driving force of countless other choices we make. Itâ€™s where weâ€™ll find our sense of meaning, value, and purpose, so I want to be corrected if I ever begin to define myself by my sexuality.
What I always come back to is this: thereâ€™s a distinction between anÂ identityÂ and a label thatâ€™s helpful in describing my experience.Â We use words to communicate our experiences so weâ€™re more fully known and more intimately connected, and â€œcelibate gay Christianâ€ has sometimes been helpful for me. It communicates that I donâ€™t experience heterosexual attractions, so I donâ€™t feel like Iâ€™m lying by omission since people otherwise assume Iâ€™m straight. It also clarifies that orientation change hasnâ€™t been my experience and it isnâ€™t the goal of a Christianâ€”Christ-likeness is the goal. And I find one of the most valuable reasons to use the term is this: young people in the church who find themselves attracted to the same sex typically think to themselves â€œIâ€™m gayâ€. I want them to know being gay doesnâ€™t have to entail a departure from Scripture and church teaching on this topic. I want them to know there are others who are also â€œgayâ€ who have submitted their sexuality to Christ as they follow Him on the path of discipleship.
None of those things are related to a gayÂ identityÂ though, and I want to be clear about that because I think itâ€™s dangerous for Christians to place our identity in anything other than Christ.Â The entirety of who I am is built upon what Christ has done (or at least thatâ€™s my aim and prayer). The redemptive narrative that runs throughout Scripture is where I find hope, value, and meaning, and my identity is one of an adopted child who was rescued by Jesus. Every term I use to communicate some aspect of my experienceâ€”introvert, laid back, sister, writer, runner, gayâ€”is simply a term used to describe part of my experience as a child of God situated in a specific way in the world.
The question of identity seems important not just for gay Christians to consider, but forÂ all ChristiansÂ to seriously consider on an ongoing basis. I know many Christians who are not being confronted about where they find their identityâ€”what theyâ€™re building their life uponâ€”because theyâ€™re straight, well-behaved, well-adjusted men and women. But in a competitive, image-driven culture, it can be easy for someone to find their identity in their work, in their accomplishments, in their appearance, in the success of their children. Without realizing it and without using a label, we can slowly start to find our value and purpose in countless things other than Christ. We begin to forget why weâ€™re hereâ€”to know God and glorify Himâ€”and weâ€™re swallowed up in approval-seeking, people-pleasing, never-ending cycles to prove that we matter. And great will be the fall of that house.Â
The language we use to describe our experience matters in the sense that language does shape the way we think about ourselves, and if we donâ€™t know what weâ€™re doing with words then words can do something with us. But the language we use to describe our experience is less important than moment-by-moment worship of God, placing Him at the center of all our thoughts and affections. Iâ€™ve come to be grateful that Iâ€™m so often questioned about my identity because it causes me to continually reflect on whether or not I really am building my life upon Christ and Christ alone. It helps me keep everything else in check, and to be prayerful about whether or not my affections are properly ordered.
It would, however, be helpful for all of us Â (gay or straight) to regularly reflect on what we point to internally for a sense of meaning and purpose and identity. If we find that weâ€™re crushed by someone elseâ€™s low opinion of us, or weâ€™re in knots over whether or not we receive recognition for our work, or weâ€™re exhausted in our efforts to fit the image of attractive and successful in our culture, then weâ€™re missing it in a way that breaks the heart of God and it will eventually break us. Weâ€™re missing it regardless of what words we use to describe that experience. But if, by the Spirit of God, weâ€™re careful to build our lives upon Him and we see that demonstrated through a life ofÂ doing what He says, then we can be confident that our Father in Heaven is glorified in us and that Heâ€™ll be faithful to display His beauty through us.
Good stuff. These days I call myself “gay” in some environments and “post-gay” in others. To be honest, my use of “gay” is often subversive, that I want to challenge the notion that gay is something that can be clearly definedÂ andÂ quantified. It is mostly a self-reported identity, as opposed to sex or race which are quantifiable without seeing someone (just take a DNA sample). So when someone says I’m *not* gay I simply ask them to prove they are or aren’t gay or straight. Usually what comes back is a form of “I am because I tell you I am”.
Andy Comiskey is currently blogging through the Beatitudes.
Weeping over oneâ€™s poverty is a gift. The contrite heart cries. Consequences of sin in our own lives and in persons we love reduce us to grief. Yet for that grief to become good, raised from the â€˜worldly sorrow that brings forth deathâ€™ (2C 7:10), we must surrender to Jesus. He bears our affliction and transports us to His Kingdom. There, divine comfort coaxes us to exchange rags for riches. The King defines us now.
The result is meekness. When one finally lets go of how (s)he will manage the unbearable weight of sin (our own, anotherâ€™s, the worldâ€™s!), God becomes who He is and we become who we are. The meek know the difference: humans are small subjects of a great Kingdom. Our littleness frees us â€˜to entrust ourselves to Him who judges justlyâ€™ (1P 2:23). We can drop our stones of judgment and rest in the One who makes all things new, beginning with ourselves.
Any proper self-assessment I possess, any real quality of meekness, has resulted from a type of â€˜reduction.â€™ I can go a long way on my own passion. It has taken bitter disappointments to level and reduce me to the Meek One. Dying again, submitting my hard husk to Him, has slowed and sweetened my heart. God claims the trauma for Kingdom purposes and releases seeds from it that later bear fruit.
Hinting at this fruit, a colleague once remarked: â€˜I like you better when youâ€™re beaten up.â€™ What he meant was: â€˜I like you better when you are reduced to Jesus.â€™ He likes meekness, those who live in apparent reliance upon the Almighty One.
Ouch, but spot on. Bring on the suffering (and throw away the Joel Osteen books).