4Thought.TV Covers Transgender Issues
Last week, the short religious slot on Channel 4 that covers the 7pm news featured seven interviews around the area of trans-genderism. As usual with these slots there were seven vignettes of people with differing experiences and opinions.
It’s not possible to embed the videos, so this is a link to Christina Beardsley’s entry and you can see the other six on the right hand side of that film clip. It’s well worth spending 20 minutes or so watching all seven videos to get a good sampling of the siffering stances on this issue. Christina reflects on her appearance on 4Thought.TV here.
Last time I wrote about these issues, here’s what I had to say.
I have to be totally open and honest with you (and my other readers) at this point and admit that I am currently engaged in a rethink on this issue of transgenderism. When we lost our second son to a chromosomal disorder (in his case Trisomy 18 â€“ Edwards Syndrome), I spent quite a bit of time exploring issues around chromosomal disfunction and other gender issues. Iâ€™m still in the middle of that exploration, but at the moment my position can be summarised as follows:
- If we lived in a perfect, Edenic, un-fallen world then issues of Transgenderism wouldnâ€™t occur. That is to say, I am convinced that transgenderism is a result of the Fall.
- However, if transgenderism is simply one variant expression of the brokeness of all humanity, we cannot (as you rightly point out) make its experience in and of itself as disbar to ministry of any kind. We are in a sense driven back to the behaviour / orientation distinction in the issue of homosexuality.
- My current issue therefore is what â€œbehaviourâ€ in the life of those who have transgender issues is sinful and what isnâ€™t. For homosexuality I think we have clear Scriptural guidelines on sexual expression. For those with transgender issues we do not.
- My key current concern is whether in assuming that the displayed sex of a person (i.e. that which they appear to be biologically) is the â€œcorrectâ€ sex, are we actually missing the truth of the situation for some people? For example, I assume Susannah that if you are a male to female transexual, your sex chromosomes are XY. A traditional conservative approach would be to argue that since you present as biologically male that is your true gender and any attempt to deny it is to embrace fallenness rather than to reject it.
- However, might it actually be the case that your true gender is female and that the development of your sex chromosomes as XY is actually a result of the Fall (in the same way that my son having a third 18th chromosome was fallen, not â€œgoodâ€). If this is the case then helping you transit from male to female is actually a â€œgoodâ€ thing rather than a â€œbadâ€ or sinful thing.
- At the same time, I am aware of a number of cases where those who have presented with very clear sex/gender self-divergences have, through bringing areas of emotional and relational brokeness to God in prayer and allowing him to heal them, have seen their self-perceived gender realign with their biological sex.
Iâ€™m not decided yet on this issue, but I am in a position where I am not prepared to condemn those who have transited sex to their self-understood gender. Certainly, I cannot see the experience of transgenderism itself as a disbar to employment in a church, though I can understand why some churches would be hesitant to employ someone who has actually transited.