Author: Peter Ould
Pilling – Two Thoughts
Two thoughts as I digest Pilling (remember folks, it’s just a discussion document) and do bits of media around it. First, the idea that permitting clergy to pretty well do what they want liturgically doesn’t change our doctrine is a …
Pilling – Bishop of Birkenhead’s Dissenting Statement
You need to read the whole Pilling Report, but the Bishop of Birkenhead’s dissenting statement spells out all the issues much better than I could. —- 415. It is with much regret that I have concluded that I cannot sign …
Pilling – Bishop of Birkenhead’s Dissenting Statement Read more »
Bull vs Hall – Supreme Court Ruling
Bull vs Hall at the Supreme Court is out and it’s fascinating. [gview file=”https://www.peter-ould.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/UKSC_2012_0065_Judgment1.pdf”] The interesting discussion is whether the Bulls discriminated against Hall and Preddy directly or indirectly. Three of the judges ruled that the discrimination was direct (i.e. …
Legal Representations
I’ve had all weekend to think about the statement that the Bishop of Winchester made last week on the Steel Report. For those who need reminding, this is the really interesting paragraph. “I have received legal representations from an interested …
Jersey – Statement from Senator
Sir Philip Bailhache issued the following statement last night in his capacity as a Senator of the States of Jersey. PRESS RELEASE 24 November 2013 I am delighted that the Dean and his clergy have been exonerated by the Steel …